Automated classification of mitotic catastrophe by use of the centromere fragmentation morphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mitotic catastrophe is a common mode of tumor cell death. Cancer cells with a defective cell-cycle checkpoint often enter mitosis with damaged or under replicated chromosomes following genotoxic treatment. Premature condensation of the under-replicated (or damaged) chromosomes results in double-stranded DNA breaks at the centromere (centromere fragmentation). Centromere fragmentation is a morphological marker of mitotic catastrophe and is distinguished by the clustering of centromeres away from the chromosomes. We present an automated 2-step system for segmentation of cells exhibiting centromere fragmentation. The first step segments individual cells from clumps. We added two new terms, weighted local repelling term (WLRt) and weighted gradient term (WGt), in the energy functional of the traditional Chan-Vese based level set method. WLRt was used to generate a repelling force when contours of adjacent cells merged and then penalized the overlap. WGt enhances gradients between overlapping cells. The second step consists of a new algorithm, SBaN (shape-based analysis of each nucleus), which extracts features like circularity, major-axis length, minor-axis length, area, and eccentricity from each chromosome to identify cells with centromere fragmentation. The performance of SBaN algorithm for centromere fragmentation detection was statistically evaluated and the results were robust.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".