MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084384599 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.150414

Effect of a New Design Electronic Control System on the Emissions Improve for Diesel Engine Operation by (Diesel + LPG)

2020· article· en· W3084384599 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohanad M. Al-kaabi, Mudhaffar S. Al‐Zuhairy, Hyder H. Balla

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringDiesel fuelDiesel engineEnvironmental scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diesel engines are important and widely used in many fields in industry, agriculture, transportation, and electricity, but the disadvantages of these engines are environmental pollution due to exhaust gas emissions as well as the high cost of diesel fuel. These defects made the topic an important research topic to search for less polluting and less expensive fuel to use it in diesel engines, and this makes LPG a good candidate for diesel supplements because it contains several technical advantages in this regard, being environment friendly and has a high heat value to increase energy production And also its price is cheap compared to diesel fuel. In this study, an electronic system was designed to control the LPG injector and a magnetic sensor was installed on top of a single-cylinder and air-cooled diesel engine head. Tested using at two-stage first diesel fuel D-100 and second stage, dual-fuel in three modes . The test was under loads (0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) at different speeds (1000, 1500 and 2000 rpm). A decrease in emission ratios (NOx, HC, CO, and CO2) is observed in all operating modes with LPG, and the best emission reduction mode is LPG-75. As for O2 gas, the results showed almost the same in diesel case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207