Effect of Different Honey Concentrations on Survival, Longevity and Reproduction of Trichospilus pupivorus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a Parasitoid of Coconut Black-Headed Caterpillar, Opisina arenosella (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many coconut producing countries in Asia are facing a serious infestation of Opisina arenosella (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae) or commonly called the coconut black-headed caterpillar. Recently, the pest has been detected in the coconut (Cocos nucifera) planting area in Pahang, Malaysia. Thus, an initiative to manage the pest by using parasitoids has been started with a study on the effects of diet on survival, longevity and reproduction of naturally occurred parasitoid known as Trichospilus pupivorus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). The aim of this study was to identify suitable concentrations of honey that can be used in developing its rearing technique. Two independent experiments were conducted, i.e., a) survival and longevity study; and b) reproduction study. In each study, different honey concentrations were tested on ten (eight replications) and one (five replications) female parasitoids respectively. 30% honey concentrations resulted in high survival rate of the adult during early life with relatively prolonged longevity up to 6.0±0.19 days and significantly produced the highest number of progenies (105.4±0.81). The lowest survival rate was given by 60% honey and significant longevity up to 6.5±0.33 days with no progenies. Further studies on other plausible factors affecting the reproduction and fitness of progenies should also be investigated to ensure efficient rearing techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".