MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Sediment failure of St. Pierre Slope: new insights of failure mechanisms and slope instability due to the 1929 Grand Banks Earthquake

2020· article· en· W3084416941 on OpenAlexaffabout
Irena Schulten, D. Mosher, David Piper, Sebastian Krastel, K MacKillop

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyNatural Resources CanadaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLandslideSeafloor spreadingBathymetrySeismologyInstabilitySubmarine pipelineSubmarine landslideSlip (aerodynamics)EscarpmentSedimentHoloceneGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 1929 Grand Banks submarine landslide was triggered by a Mw 7.2 strike slip earthquake on the southwestern Grand Banks of Newfoundland. Studies following the event by several decades were the first to recognize that slope failure can cause tsunamis. These studies identified St. Pierre Slope as the main failure area and showed widespread, shallow (<25 m-thick), translational and possibly retrogressive sediment failures occurred predominately in >1700 m water depth (mwd). It seems unlikely this style of failure in deep water generated a tsunami that had >13 m of run-up along the coast of Newfoundland. The objective of this study is to identify possible alternative tsunami source mechanisms and pre-conditioning factors that may have led to sediment instability. These objectives are addressed using a comprehensive data set of multiscale 2D seismic reflection, multibeam swath bathymetry and laboratory geomechanical test data. Results show numerous reflection offsets within the Quaternary section of the slope underneath modern seafloor escarpments (750-2300 mwd). These offsets appear down to 550 m below seafloor (mbsf) and are interpreted as low angle (~17°), planar-normal faults of <100 m-high vertical and ~330 m of horizontal displacement. The faults are interpreted as part of a massive (~560 km³) complex slump with evidence for multiple décollements (250 mbsf & 400-550 mbsf) and slumping in at least two directions. Infinite slope stability analysis using peak ground acceleration (PGA) indicates that a combination of earthquake loading and the presence of geomechanical weak layers are needed to explain the slope failure. At St. Pierre Slope, the analysis of sediment cores shows that geomechanical weak layers form as a consequence of underconsolidation in connection with excess pore pressures that are related to: 1) high sedimentation rates, 2) instantaneous deposition of mass transport deposits (MTD’s) and sandy turbidites, and 3) the presence of gas. The décollements of the slump are associated with MTD’s and sediment waves that likely form weak layers. The layers of sediment waves are assumed to consist of sorted silts or fine sands and are therefore likely to be susceptible to excess pore pressure development during earthquake loading. Excess pore pressure development results in reduced effective stress and higher potential for instability. It is interpreted, therefore, that the 1929 earthquake triggered displacement of a 550 m-thick slump with ~100 m of vertical seafloor displacement. This instantaneous displacement of the slump in 750 mwd with a seafloor volume displacement of 70 to 130 km² is likely a more effective source for tsunami generation than the translational, shallow (<25 m) failures in deeper water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicearthquake and tectonic studies→French-language works237,207→