MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084419370 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.150418

Industrial Transfer and Spatial Structure Optimization of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province

2020· article· en· W3084419370 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Economic and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeijingGeographyTransfer (computing)Computer scienceChinaArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to fully promote the industrial coordination development in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province and form a development structure with rational spatial patterns and optimized allocation of various industries, this study uses the market potential model based on the new economic geography to, quantitatively analyse the market potential and spatial pattern of Beijing, Tianjin and various cities in Hebei Province from 2012 to 2019, obtains the dominant industries of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province. Then, the study adopts the industrial location quotient model to perform empirical study on the industrial conditions of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province and explore the location and routing problem of industrial transfer for Beijing from the perspectives of possibility and feasibility by taking into account the development objectives and positioning of the urban agglomeration in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province. The following conclusions are obtained: 1) The spatial pattern of the regional market potential of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province centres on Beijing and Tianjin, and the market potential gradually decreases from inside to outside. There are three tiers: Beijing and Tianjin have the greatest market potentials; followed by Langfang, Tangshan, Baoding, Cangzhou and Shijiazhuang, and Qinhuangdao, Handan, Xingtai, Hengshui, Chengde and Zhangjiakou have the lowest market potentials. 2) The market shares of Langfang, Tangshan, Baoding, Cangzhou, Chengde and Zhangjiakou are mainly from Beijing and Tianjin and have the closest connections with these two cities. 3) The market potential gaps between Hebei and Beijing and Tianjin are on an increasing trend. Therefore, to achieve coordinated development in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province, Beijing and Tianjin must give full play to their radiating and driving roles and selectively shift some of the industries to Hebei Province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it