Ab Interno Canaloplasty in Open-angle Glaucoma Patients Combined With In Vivo Trypan Blue Aqueous Venography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To demonstrate canalogram patterns observed when trypan blue tracer is combined with oculoviscoelastic device during ab interno canaloplasty, and discuss surgical results and potential implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective small case series study. RESULTS: The authors performed this procedure on 5 patients with informed consent with 4 to 18 months of follow-up. All procedures have been complication free. The average preoperative intraocular pressure was 16.4 mm Hg with an average number of topical glaucoma medications being equal to 3.6. Postoperatively, the average intraocular pressure for the group was reduced to 13 mm Hg with a concurrent drop in the average number of topical medications used equaling 1.8. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there are limited practical options to evaluate the patency of the aqueous outflow system in our patients. The primary purpose of this paper is to describe canalogram patterns observed during ab interno canaloplasty with trypan blue. This technique may allow us to further our understanding of the aqueous outflow system and its role in the underlying pathophysiology of glaucoma. Further research is required to evaluate the prognostic and diagnostic significance of this technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".