MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084525766 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31907-3

The Lancet NCDI Poverty Commission: bridging a gap in universal health coverage for the poorest billion

2020· review· en· W3084525766 on OpenAlexaff
Gene Bukhman, Ana Olga Mocumbi, Rifat Atun, Anne E. Becker, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Agnès Binagwaho, Chelsea Clinton, Matthew M Coates, Katie Dain, Majid Ezzati, Gary Gottlieb, Indrani Gupta, Neil Gupta, Adnan A. Hyder, Yogesh Jain, Margaret E. Kruk, Julie Makani, Andrew Marx, J. Jaime Miranda, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Rachel Nugent, Nobhojit Roy, Lee Wallis, Bongani M. Mayosi, Kafui Adjaye-Gbewonyo, Alma J Adler, Fred Amegashie, Mary Kigasia Amuyunzu-Nyamongo, Said Habib Arwal, Nicole Bassoff, Jason Beste, Chantelle Boudreaux, Peter Byass, Jean Roland Cadet, Wubaye Walelgne Dagnaw, Arielle Wilder Eagan, Andrea B Feigl, Gladwell Gathecha, Annie Haakenstad, Abraham Haileamlak, Kjell Arne Johansson, Mamusu Kamanda, Biraj Karmacharya, Noel Kasomekera, Alex Kintu, Bhagawan Koirala, Gene F. Kwan, Nancy Charles Larco, Sarah Maongezi, Jones Masiye, Mary Mayige, Amy McLaughlin, Solomon Tessema Memirie, Humberto Muquingue, Kibachio Joseph Mwangi, Gilles Ndayisaba, Christopher Noble, Bashir Noormal, Maia Olsen, Paul Park, Gisela Robles Aguilar, Osman Sankoh, Akshar Saxena, Leah N. Schwartz, Dan Schwarz, Jonathan D. Shaffer, Zoe Taylor Doe, Senendra Raj Upreti, Stéphane Verguet, David Watkins, Emily B Wroe

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health ResearchHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteMedical Research CouncilDirektoratet for UtviklingssamarbeidJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthWellcome TrustMinneapolis Heart Institute FoundationStrykerWorld Bank GroupJohns Hopkins UniversityInter-American Development BankAmerican Cancer SocietyLeona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable TrustHarvard Medical School
KeywordsPledgeBridging (networking)PovertyDignityPolitical scienceCommissionSustainable developmentEconomic growthHuman rightsPoor peopleDevelopment economicsLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations296
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe LancetSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207