LIONirs: flexible Matlab toolbox for fNIRS data analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a suitable tool for recording brain function in pediatric or challenging populations. As with other neuroimaging techniques, the scientific community is engaged in an evolving debate regarding the most adequate methods for performing fNIRS data analyses. New method We introduce LIONirs, a neuroinformatics toolbox for fNIRS data analysis, designed to follow two main goals: (1) flexibility, to explore several methods in parallel and verify results using 3D visualization; (2) simplicity, to apply a defined processing pipeline to a large dataset of subjects by using the MATLAB Batch System. Results Within the graphical user interfaces (DisplayGUI), the user can reject noisy intervals and correct artifacts, while visualizing the topographical projection of the data onto the 3D head representation. Data decomposition methods are available for the identification of relevant signatures, such as brain responses or artifacts. Multimodal data recorded simultaneously to fNIRS, such as physiology, electroencephalography or audio-video, can be visualized using the DisplayGUI. The toolbox includes several functions that allow one to read, preprocess, and analyze fNIRS data, including task-based and functional connectivity measures. Comparison with existing methods Several good neuroinformatics tools for fNIRS data analysis are currently available. None of them emphasize multimodal visualization of the data throughout the preprocessing steps and multidimensional decomposition, which are essential for understanding challenging data. Furthermore, LIONirs provides compatibility and complementarity with other existing tools by supporting common data format. Conclusions LIONirs offers a flexible platform for basic and advanced fNIRS data analysis, shown through real experimental examples. Highlights The LIONirs toolbox is designed for fNIRS data inspection and visualization. Methods are integrated for isolation of relevant activity and correction of artifacts. Multimodal auxiliary, EEG or audio-video are visualized alongside the fNIRS data. Task-based and functional connectivity measure analysis tools are available. The code structure allows to automated and standardized analysis of large data set. Graphical abstract
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.123 | 0.048 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".