Assessment of mutagenic and antimutagenic effects of Punica granatum against ifosfamide induced chromosomal aberrations in male albino mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study has been done to assess the mutagenic and antimutagenic effects of Punica granatum (Pomegranate) seed extract against the genotoxic effects ifosfamide (IFO) in male albino mice Mus musculus of BALB/c strain. The pomegranate seed extract (tablets) was provided by Source naturals, INC. Santa Cruse Company, Canada (from Egypt). Two independent experiments were performed. In the first, mice was treated daily and orally with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) as negative control group, and the other three groups were treated daily and orally with three different doses of the P. granatum seed extract (12.5, 25, and 50 mg/kg b.w.) for five weeks in order to test the clastogenetic effects of the plant seed extract. In the second experiment, the first group was positive control group which weekly and intraperitonially was treated with ifosfamide (100 mg/kg b.w.), the other three groups were treated daily and orally with three different doses of the pomegranate seed extract (12.5, 25, and 50 mg/kg b.w.) and also intraperitonially treated at the end of each week with IFO for five weeks to test the protective effects P. granatum seed extract. The results of the first experiment indicated that the P. granatum seed extract has no significant clastogenetic effects on chromosomal aberrations of the bone marrow cells of treated mice. The results of the second experiment was that the P. granatum seed extract, especially at the third dose (50 mg/kg b.w.) exhibited well protective and anti-clastogenetic effect against the genotoxic actions of the ifosfamide on bone marrow cells
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".