McKay Quivers and Lusztig Algebras of Some Finite Groups
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We are interested in the McKay quiver Γ( G ) and skew group rings A ∗ G , where G is a finite subgroup of GL( V ), where V is a finite dimensional vector space over a field K , and A is a K − G -algebra. These skew group rings appear in Auslander’s version of the McKay correspondence. In the first part of this paper we consider complex reflection groups $\mathsf {G} \subseteq \text {GL}(V)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊆</mml:mo><mml:mtext>GL</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> and find a combinatorial method, making use of Young diagrams, to construct the McKay quivers for the groups G ( r , p , n ). We first look at the case G (1,1, n ), which is isomorphic to the symmetric group S n , followed by G ( r ,1, n ) for r > 1. Then, using Clifford theory, we can determine the McKay quiver for any G ( r , p , n ) and thus for all finite irreducible complex reflection groups up to finitely many exceptions. In the second part of the paper we consider a more conceptual approach to McKay quivers of arbitrary finite groups: we define the Lusztig algebra $\widetilde {A}(\mathsf {G})$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>~</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> of a finite group $\mathsf {G} \subseteq \text {GL}(V)$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊆</mml:mo><mml:mtext>GL</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> , which is Morita equivalent to the skew group ring A ∗ G . This description gives us an embedding of the basic algebra Morita equivalent to A ∗ G into a matrix algebra over A .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it