Maternal hyperoxygenation in congenital heart disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The importance of prenatal diagnosis and fetal intervention has been increasing as a preventative strategy for improving the morbidity and mortality in congenital heart disease (CHD). The advancements in medical imaging technology have greatly enhanced our understanding of disease progression, assessment, and impact in those with CHD. In particular, there has been a growing focus on improving the morbidity and mortality of fetuses diagnosed with left-sided lesions. The disruption of fetal hemodynamics resulting from poor structural developmental of the left outflow tract during cardiogenesis is considered a major factor in the progressive lethal underdevelopment of the left ventricle (LV). This positive feedback cycle of inadequate flow and underdevelopment of the LV leads to a disrupted fetal circulation, which has been described to impact fetal brain growth where systemic outflow is poor and, in some cases, the fetal lungs in the setting of a restrictive interatrial communication. For the past decade, maternal hyperoxygenation (MH) has been investigated as a diagnostic tool to assess the pulmonary vasculature and a therapeutic agent to improve the development of the heart and brain in fetuses with CHD with a focus on left-sided cardiac defects. This review discusses the findings of these studies as well as the utility of acute and chronic administration of MH in CHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".