Metabolism as a central regulator of β‐cell chromatin state
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pancreatic β-cells are critical mediators of glucose homeostasis in the body, and proper cellular nutrient metabolism is critical to β-cell function. Several interacting signaling networks that uniquely control β-cell metabolism produce essential substrates and co-factors for catalytic reactions, including reactions that modify chromatin. Chromatin modifications, in turn, regulate gene expression. The reactions that modify chromatin are therefore well-positioned to adjust gene expression programs according to nutrient availability. It follows that dysregulation of nutrient metabolism in β-cells may impact chromatin state and gene expression through altering the availability of these substrates and co-factors. Metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes (T2D) can significantly alter metabolite levels in cells. This suggests that a driver of β-cell dysfunction during T2D may be the altered availability of substrates or co-factors necessary to maintain β-cell chromatin state. Induced changes in the β-cell chromatin modifications may then lead to dysregulation of gene expression, in turn contributing to the downward cascade of events that leads to the loss of functional β-cell mass, and loss of glucose homeostasis, that occurs in T2D.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".