MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Upcoming food matrix stable isotope reference materials from the USGS: honeys, vegetable oils, flours, and collagens

2020· article· en· W3085575824 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nives Ogrinc, Arndt Schimmelmann, Haiping Qi, Federica Camin, Luana Bontempo, Doris Potočnik, Aiman Abrahim, Andrew Cannavan, James F. Carter, Philip J. H. Dunn, Lauren T. Reid, Tyler B. Coplen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An international project developed, quality-tested, and measured isotope−delta values of 10 new food matrix reference materials (RMs) for hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur stable isotope-ratio measurements to support food authenticity testing and food provenance verification. These new RMs will enable users to normalize measurements of samples to isotope−delta scales. The RMs span a range of δ2HVSMOW values from −207.4 to −43.3 mUr or ‰, for δ13CVPDB from −30.60 to −13.72 mUr, for δ15Nair from +1.78 to +14.96 mUr, for δ18OVSMOW from +18.20 to +26.33 mUr, and for δ34SVCDT from −20.25 to +17.49 mUr. The RMs include (i) a pair of honeys from Canada and tropical Vietnam, (ii) flours from C3 (rice) and C4 (millet) plants, (iii) four vegetable oils from C3 (olive, peanut) and C4 (corn) plants, and (iv) collagen powders from marine fish and terrestrial mammal origins. After thorough homogenization of the bulk materials, multiple aliquots were sealed in glass under vacuum or noble gas to exclude oxygen and to potentially extend the shelf life to decades when stored at –18 °C in the dark. A total of six laboratories from five countries used various analytical approaches and instrumentation for two- or multiple-point isotopic normalization against international RMs. The use of reference waters and organic liquids in silver tubes allowed direct normalization of δ2H values of organic materials against isotopic reference waters following the principle of identical treatment, minimizing interference from atmospheric moisture. An errors-in-variables regression model that included the uncertainty associated with the measured and assigned values of the RMs was applied centrally to normalize results and obtain consensus values and measurement uncertainties reported here for new RMs USGS82 to USGS91. Because of exchangeable hydrogen and H2O in some RMs (especially in honeys, collagens, and flours), sample loading in contact with laboratory air and different types of pre-treatment can result in significant bulk δ2H variance. Utilization of these new RMs should foster mutual compatibility of δ2H values if harmonized technical/analytical approaches are followed and documented in data reports.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIsotope Analysis in Ecology→French-language works237,207→