MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3085699414 · doi:10.1111/cea.13731

A randomized, placebo‐controlled trial evaluating effects of lebrikizumab on airway eosinophilic inflammation and remodelling in uncontrolled asthma (CLAVIER)

2020· article· en· W3085699414 on OpenAlex
Cary D. Austin, Melissa Gonzalez Edick, Ronald E. Ferrando, Margaret Solon, Miriam Baca, Kathryn Mesh, Peter Bradding, Gail M. Gauvreau, Kaharu Sumino, J. Mark FitzGerald, Elliot Israel, L Bjermer, Arnaud Bourdin, Joseph R. Arron, David F. Choy, Julie Olsson, Francis Abreu, Monet Howard, Kit Wong, Fang Cai, Kun Peng, Wendy S. Putnam, Cécile Holweg, John G. Matthews, Monica Kraft, Prescott G. Woodruff

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical & Experimental Allergy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster University
FundersGenentechF. Hoffmann-La Roche
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaEosinophilAirwayExhaled nitric oxidePlaceboInflammationInternal medicineFibrosisEosinophilicGastroenterologyEosinophil cationic proteinPathologySurgerySpirometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The anti‐interleukin 13 (IL‐13) monoclonal antibody lebrikizumab improves lung function in patients with moderate‐to‐severe uncontrolled asthma, but its effects on airway inflammation and remodelling are unknown. CLAVIER was designed to assess lebrikizumab's effect on eosinophilic inflammation and remodelling. Objective To report safety and efficacy results from enrolled participants with available data from CLAVIER. Methods We performed bronchoscopy on patients with uncontrolled asthma before and after 12 weeks of randomized double‐blinded treatment with lebrikizumab (n = 31) or placebo (n = 33). The pre‐specified primary end‐point was relative change in airway subepithelial eosinophils per mm 2 of basement membrane (cells/mm 2 ). Pre‐specified secondary and exploratory outcomes included change in IL‐13‐associated biomarkers and measures of airway remodelling. Results There was a baseline imbalance in tissue eosinophils and high variability between treatment groups. There was no discernible change in adjusted mean subepithelial eosinophils/mm 2 in response to lebrikizumab (95% CI, −82.5%, 97.5%). As previously observed, FEV 1 increased after lebrikizumab treatment. Moreover, subepithelial collagen thickness decreased 21.5% after lebrikizumab treatment (95% CI, −32.9%, −10.2%), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide, CCL26 and SERPINB2 mRNA expression in bronchial tissues also reduced. Lebrikizumab was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with other lebrikizumab asthma studies. Conclusions & Clinical Relevance We did not observe reduced tissue eosinophil numbers in association with lebrikizumab treatment. However, in pre‐specified exploratory analyses, lebrikizumab treatment was associated with reduced degree of subepithelial fibrosis, a feature of airway remodelling, as well as improved lung function and reduced key pharmacodynamic biomarkers in bronchial tissues. These results reinforce the importance of IL‐13 in airway pathobiology and suggest that neutralization of IL‐13 may reduce asthmatic airway remodelling. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02099656.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it