MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3085724203 · doi:10.3390/atmos11090978

Temperature Response from the Change of Surface Heat Flux and Vertical Diffusivity by Urbanization

2020· article· en· W3085724203 on OpenAlexaff
Shuzhan Ren, Craig Stroud

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmosphere · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal diffusivityMass diffusivityDiffusionTemperature gradientFlux (metallurgy)Materials scienceMechanicsThermodynamicsPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 1-D diffusion model of temperature is employed to understand important features of temperature response to the changes of surface heat flux (SHF) and vertical diffusivity shown in 3-D model simulations. Analytical results show that the temperature response to the SHF change is the convolution of the SHF change and Green’s function (GF). Because the GF is inversely proportional to the square root of diffusion coefficient near the surface, weak/strong diffusivity in the early morning/noontime tends to generate a large/small temperature response by slowing/accelerating heat flow from surface to the atmosphere. The modulation effect of the GF and the convolution effect explain very different temperature responses to the SHF change during each period. Analytical results also show that the temperature response to the change of DF is equal to the convolution of the product of diffusion coefficient change, vertical gradients of reference temperature and the GF. Because the vertical gradient of the GF is negative below 80 m, enhanced/reduced diffusivity would enhance/weaken the urban temperature, if the vertical gradient of reference temperature is negative/positive. Numerical results with typical values of the changes of SHF and diffusivity suggest that the changes of SHF has the dominant contribution to the temperature response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmosphereSame topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207