MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Glued intraocular lens in eyes with deficient capsules: retrospective analysis of long-term effects

2020· article· en· W3086226040 on OpenAlexaff
Dhivya Ashok Kumar, Amar Agarwal, Atul Dhawan, Vijay Anand Thambusamy, Soundari Sivangnanam, Triveni Venktesh, Radhika Chandrasekar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraocular Surgery and Lenses
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOphthalmologyVisual acuityIntraocular lensDioptreIntraocular pressureGlaucomaUveitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term (6-12 years) results and complications of glued transscleral-fixated intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Dr. Agarwal's Eye Center, Chennai, India. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Eyes with glued IOL of more than 5-year follow-up were evaluated. Visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]), IOL tilt, corneal topography, corneal endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, central foveal thickness, and ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 91 eyes (63 patients) with mean postoperative 8.2 ± 2.3 years were analyzed. The duration was 10 to 12 years in 31 eyes (34%), 9 years in 14 eyes (15.3%), and 6 to 9 years in 46 eyes (50.5%). No subscleral haptic was visible in 50% eyes. Mild, moderate, and severe grade of haptic visibility was noted in 33.5%, 9.4%, and 7%, respectively. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.50 ± 0.50 logMAR. Clinically, no tilt was seen in 87 eyes (95.6%), whereas detectable tilt was seen in 4 eyes (4.3%). The optical coherence tomography microtilt was 0.8 ± 1.7 and 0.4 ± 1.2 degrees in 90- and 180-degree axes, respectively. The mean iris vault was 0.45 mm, and the mean ORA was 1.10 ± 1.00 diopter. Complications were glaucoma (7.6%), IOL luxation (4.4%), retinal detachment (3.2%), macular edema (4.3%), corneal decompensation (3.2%), uveitis (2.1%), and uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome (1%). Haptic reposition (3.2%), retinal detachment surgery (3.2%) keratoplasty (1%), pupilloplasty (2.1%), and IOL explantation (1%) were the second surgeries performed. CONCLUSIONS: Glued IOL has shown good anatomical and functional stability with minimal incidence of vision-threatening complications on long-term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cataract & Refractive SurgerySame topicIntraocular Surgery and LensesFrench-language works237,207