Contrasting tempos of sex chromosome degeneration in sticklebacks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The steps of sex chromosome evolution are often thought to follow a predictable pattern and tempo, but few studies have examined how the outcomes of this process differ between closely related species with homologous sex chromosomes. The sex chromosomes of the threespine stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ) and Japan Sea stickleback ( G. nipponicus ) have been well characterized. Little is known, however, about the sex chromosomes in their distantly related congener, the blackspotted stickleback ( G. wheatlandi ). We used pedigrees of interspecific crosses to obtain the first phased X and Y genomic sequences from blackspotted sticklebacks. Using novel statistical methods, we demonstrate that the oldest stratum of the Gasterosteus sex chromosomes evolved on Chromosome 19 in the ancestor of all three species. Despite this shared ancestry, the sex chromosomes of the blackspotted stickleback have experienced much more extensive recombination suppression, XY differentiation, and Y degeneration than those of the other two species. The ancestral blackspotted stickleback Y chromosome fused with Chromosome 12 less than 1.4 million years ago, which may have been favored by the very small size of the recombining region on the ancestral sex chromosome. Recombination is also suppressed between the X and Y over the bulk of Chromosome 12, although it has experienced little degeneration. These results demonstrate that sex chromosome evolution does not always follow a predictable tempo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".