MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Stratospheric Australian fire smoke layers over Punta Arenas, Chile, measured by ground-based lidar and AEOLUS

2020· article· en· W3086455191 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin Ohneiser, Holger Baars, Cristofer Jiménez, Johannes Bühl, Patric Seifert, Athena Augusta Floutsi, Martin Radenz, Ulla Wandinger, Albert Ansmann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStratosphereSmokeAtmospheric sciencesAerosolSouthern HemisphereNorthern HemisphereLidarWavelengthEnvironmental scienceChemistryClimatologyMeteorologyPhysicsGeologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exceptionally strong wildfire activity in Australia in summer 2019-2020 triggered the evolution of pyrocumulonimbus clouds, releasing enormous amounts of fire smoke into the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere region of the usually very clean southern hemisphere. Measurements at the lidar site of Punta Arenas (53°S), Chile, show that the first stratospheric smoke layers arrived over Punta Arenas at 6 Jan 2020. First results show striking similarities to a record-breaking event of stratospheric smoke layers from wildfires in Canada in 2017 (Baars et al., ACP 2019). At Punta Arenas, lidar ratios reach values of 45-50 sr at 355 nm, and 60-65 sr at 532 nm wavelength. Particle linear depolarization ratios reach values of 19% at 355 nm, and 15% at 532 nm wavelength. Aeolus is able to detect these intense layers of stratospheric smoke in the southern hemisphere as well. In this contribution, we will discuss our findings of extensive and intensive smoke optical properties over Punta Arenas to the related Aeolus aerosol spin off products of nearby overpasses. Especially the particle linear depolarization ratio at 355 nm are of relevance as AEOLUS is only able to measure the co-polarized 355 nm signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds→French-language works237,207→