MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3086756029 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2734

CHIMPS2: survey description and 12CO emission in the Galactic Centre

2020· article· en· W3086756029 on OpenAlexaff
David Eden, T. J. T. Moore, M. J. Currie, A. J. Rigby, Erik Rosolowsky, Yang Su, Kee‐Tae Kim, Harriet Parsons, Ó. Morata, H-R Chen, Tetsuhiro Minamidani, Geumsook Park, S. E. Ragan, J. S. Urquhart, Raffaele Rani, K. Tahani, S. J. Billington, Soumen Deb, C. Figura, T. Fujiyoshi, G. Joncas, Li-Wen Liao, Tie Liu, Hongjun Ma, P. Tuan-Anh, Hyeong-Sik Yun, Suinan Zhang, Ming Zhu, Jonathan D. Henshaw, Steven N. Longmore, Masato I. N. Kobayashi, M. A. Thompson, Yiping Ao, J. Campbell-White, T-C Ching, Eun Jung Chung, A. Duarte-Cabral, Michel Fich, Yu Gao, Sarah Graves, F. Kemper, Y-J Kuan, Woojin Kwon, Chang Won Lee, Jeong‐Eun Lee, Meizi Liu, Camilo Peñaloza, N. Peretto, Nguyễn Thị Phương, J. E. Pineda, R. Plume, Evaria Puspitaningrum, M. R. Samal, Archana Soam, Yan Sun, Xindi Tang, A. Traficante, G. J. White, C-H Yan, A. Y. Yang, Jinghua Yuan, Nannan Yue, Ashley Bemis, Christopher M. Brunt, Z. Chen, Jungyeon Cho, Paul C. Clark, C. J. Cyganowski, Per Friberg, G. A. Fuller, Ilseung Han, M. G. Hoare, Natsuko Izumi, H-J Kim, Jaeheon Kim, Shinyoung Kim, Eric W. Koch, Nario Kuno, K M Lacialle, H. Lee, Y-H Lee, Di Li, Steve Mairs, Zhizheng Pan, Lei Qian, Peter Scicluna, C-S Shi, Hui Shi, S. Srinivasan, Q-H Tan, H. Thomas, Kazufumi Torii, Alfonso Trejo, Tomofumi Umemoto, Giulio Violino, S. H. J. Wallström, B. Wang, Yuanwei Wu, Lixia Yuan, Cheng Zhang, Miaomiao Zhang, Chenlin Zhou, Jianjun Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityMcMaster UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of AlbertaCentre for Research in Astrophysics of QuébecUniversité LavalKwantlen Polytechnic University
FundersNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanNational Research Foundation of KoreaChinese Academy of SciencesMinistry of FinanceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationMinistry of Education, Science and TechnologyKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationLeverhulme TrustAcademia Sinica
KeywordsPhysicsGalactic planeAstrophysicsGalaxyMilky WaySpiral galaxyAngular resolution (graph drawing)TelescopeAstronomyGalactic Center

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The latest generation of Galactic Plane surveys is enhancing our ability to study the effects of galactic environment upon the process of star formation. We present the first data from CO Heterodyne Inner Milky Way Plane Survey 2 (CHIMPS2). CHIMPS2 is a survey that will observe the Inner Galaxy, the Central Molecular Zone (CMZ), and a section of the Outer Galaxy in 12CO, 13CO, and C18O $(J = 3\rightarrow 2)$ emission with the Heterodyne Array Receiver Program on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT). The first CHIMPS2 data presented here are a first look towards the CMZ in 12CO J = 3 → 2 and cover ${-}3^{\circ }\, \le \, \ell \, \le \, 5^{\circ }$ and $\mid {b} \mid \, \le \, 0{_{.}^{\circ}} 5$ with angular resolution of 15 arcsec, velocity resolution of 1 km s−1, and rms $\Delta \, T_A ^\ast =$ 0.58 K at these resolutions. Such high-resolution observations of the CMZ will be a valuable data set for future studies, whilst complementing the existing Galactic Plane surveys, such as SEDIGISM, the ${Herschel}$ infrared Galactic Plane Survey, and ATLASGAL. In this paper, we discuss the survey plan, the current observations and data, as well as presenting position–position maps of the region. The position–velocity maps detect foreground spiral arms in both absorption and emission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207