In vivo estimation of normal left ventricular stiffness and contractility based on routine cine MR acquisition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estimation of subject-specific myocardial stiffness and contractility are difficult in the current clinical practice, if not impossible. An non invasive estimation approach that can be easily adopted in the clinical practice is necessary. Personalization of left ventricle model from standard cardiac MRI acquisitions is introduced to obtain Stiffness and Contractility indices. Extensive model validation was done against MR measurements and literature values. The obtained range of normal myocardial stiffness and contractility can be used for future studies on pathological hearts. Post-myocardial infarction remodeling process is known to alter the mechanical properties of the heart. Biomechanical parameters, such as tissue stiffness and contractility, would be useful for clinicians to better assess the severity of the diseased heart. However, these parameters are difficult to obtain in the current clinical practice. In this paper, we estimated subject-specific in vivo myocardial stiffness and contractility from 21 healthy volunteers, based on left ventricle models constructed from data acquired from routine cardiac MR acquisition only. The subject-specific biomechanical parameters were quantified using an inverse finite-element modelling approach. The personalized models were evaluated against relevant clinical metrics extracted from the MR data, such as circumferential strain, wall thickness and fractional thickening. We obtained the ranges of healthy biomechanical indices of 1.60 ± 0.22 kPa for left ventricular stiffness and 95.13 ± 14.56 kPa for left ventricular contractility. These reference normal values can be used for future model-based investigation on the stiffness and contractility of ischemic myocardium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".