MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087007565 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2019-0239

The AC006262.5–miR-7855-5p–BPY2C axis facilitates hepatocellular carcinoma proliferation and migration

2020· article· en· W3087007565 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fenrong Chen, Yan Wang, Yan Cheng, Haitao Shi, Hong Li, Miao Jia, Sumei Sha, Lei Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHepatocellular carcinomaDownregulation and upregulationmicroRNACancer researchLong non-coding RNAIn vivoBiologyCell growthMedicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is typically fatal, and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are usually diagnosed at the late stages. Although the treatments for HCC have been rapidly advancing, novel targets for HCC are still desperately needed, especially for targeted therapies. Here, we identified an enriched long non-coding RNA, AC006262.5, associated with HCC, that promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasiveness of HCC cells, both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, our results revealed that AC006262.5 bound to and regulated miR-7855-5p, a tumor-suppressive miRNA, in HCC. Moreover, our data show that AC006262.5 regulates the expression of BPY2C via miR-7855-5p. Finally, we found that AC006262.5 and miR-7855-5p formed a regulatory loop. Upregulation of AC006262.5 resulted in decreased expression of miR-7855-5p, and downregulation of miR-7855-5p further facilitated the expression of AC006262.5. Our work provides novel targets for HCC diagnosis and treatment, and sheds light on the lncRNA-miRNA regulatory nexus that controls the pathology of HCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207