MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087019129 · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0183

Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Tissues are Mechanically Superior to Meniscus Cells

2020· article· en· W3087019129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTissue Engineering Part A · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesenchymal stem cellMeniscusStem cellBone marrowStem cell transplantation for articular cartilage repairBiomedical engineeringPathologyCell biologyChemistryMedicineEndothelial stem cellAdult stem cellBiologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have the potential to form the mechanically responsive matrices of joint tissues, including the menisci of the knee joint. The purpose of this study is to assess BMSC's potential to engineer meniscus-like tissue relative to meniscus fibrochondrocytes (MFCs). MFCs were isolated from castoffs of partial meniscectomy from nonosteoarthritic knees. BMSCs were developed from bone marrow aspirates of the iliac crest. All cells were of human origin. Cells were cultured in type I collagen scaffolds under normoxia (21% O 2 ) for 2 weeks followed by hypoxia (3% O 2 ) for 3 weeks. The structural and functional assessment of the generated meniscus constructs were based on glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, histological appearance, gene expression, and mechanical properties. The tissues formed by both cell types were histologically positive for Safranin O stain and appeared more intense in the BMSC constructs. This observation was confirmed by a 2.7-fold higher GAG content. However, there was no significant difference in collagen I ( COL1A2 ) expression in BMSC- and MFC-based constructs ( p = 0.17). The expression of collagen II ( COL2A1 ) and aggrecan ( ACAN ) were significantly higher in BMSCs than MFC ( p ≤ 0.05). Also, the gene expression of the hypertrophic marker collagen X ( COL10A1 ) was 199-fold higher in BMSCs than MFC ( p < 0.001). Moreover, relaxation moduli were significantly higher in BMSC-based constructs at 10–20% strain step than MFC-based constructs. BMSC-based constructs expressed higher COL2A1 , ACAN , COL10A1 , contained higher GAG content, and exhibited higher relaxation moduli at 10–20% strain than MFC-based construct. Impact statement Cell-based tissue engineering (TE) has the potential to produce functional tissue replacements for irreparably damaged knee meniscus. But the source of cells for the fabrication of the tissue replacements is currently unknown and of research interest in orthopedic TE. In this study, we fabricated tissue-engineered constructs using type I collagen scaffolds and two candidate cell sources in meniscus TE. We compared the mechanical properties of the tissues formed from human meniscus fibrochondrocytes and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Our data show that the tissues engineered from the BMSC are mechanically superior in relaxation modulus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it