Longitudinal Assessment of Autonomic Function during the Acute Phase of Spinal Cord Injury: Use of Low-Frequency Blood Pressure Variability as a Quantitative Measure of Autonomic Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-level spinal cord injury (SCI) can disrupt cardiovascular autonomic function. However, the evolution of cardiovascular autonomic function in the acute phase following injury is unknown. We evaluated the timing, severity, progression, and implications of cardiovascular autonomic injury following acute SCI. We tested 63 individuals with acute traumatic SCI (aged 48 ± 2 years) at five time-points: <2 weeks, and 1, 3, 6–12, and >12 months post-injury. Supine beat-to-beat systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and R-R interval (RRI) were recorded and low-frequency variability (LF SAP and LF RRI) determined. Cross-spectral analyses were used to determine baroreflex function (low frequency) and cardiorespiratory interactions (high frequency). Known electrocardiographic (ECG) markers for arrhythmia and self-reported symptoms of cardiovascular dysfunction were determined. Comparisons were made with historical data from individuals with chronic SCI and able-bodied controls. Most individuals had high-level (74%) motor/sensory incomplete (63%) lesions. All participants had decreased LF SAP at <2 weeks (2.22 ± 0.65 mm Hg 2 ). Autonomic injury was defined as high-level SCI with LF SAP <2 mm Hg 2 . Two distinct groups emerged by 1 month: autonomically complete SCI with sustained low LF SAP (0.76 ± 0.17 mm Hg 2 ) and autonomically incomplete SCI with increased LF SAP (5.46 ± 1.0 mm Hg 2 , p < 0.05). Autonomically complete injuries did not recover over time. Cardiovascular symptoms were prevalent and worsened with time, especially in those with autonomically complete lesions, and chronic SCI. Baroreflex function and cardiorespiratory interactions were impaired after SCI. Risk of arrhythmia increased immediately after SCI, and remained elevated throughout the acute phase. Acute SCI is associated with severe cardiovascular dysfunction. LF SAP provides a simple, non-invasive, translatable, quantitative assessment of autonomic function, and is most informative 1 month after injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".