Laparoscopic treatment of varicocele within adolescents in two African countries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Varicocele is often ignored by adolescents and their parents, in our context. The aim of the study is to present the indications and results of laparoscopic treatment in a population of adolescent students. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: It is a descriptive and analytical prospective study over a period of 9 months (January to September 2013), focussed on cases of varicocele Grade 3 found in adolescents during a screening, and who underwent surgical treatment by laparoscopy. The laparoscopic treatment was done as part of a training mission to paediatrics surgeons, through a European Non-governmental organisation in two university hospitals in Africa. Of 2724 adolescent students examined, 149 (5.47%) had a varicocele. The average age was 16.39 ± 2.05 years (12 and 19). The side was unilateral (79.19%) with 76.51% left or bilateral (20.81%) (P = 0.00). According to the classification of Dubin and Amelar, there were 58 (38.92%) cases of Grade 1, 66 (44.30%) were Grade 2 and 25 (16.78%) were Grade 3. RESULTS: The laparoscopic treatment was performed in 23 patients with varicocele Grade 3, by modified Palomo's technique, sectioning a segment of vessels between clips (15) between nodes (2) or after coagulation without clips and ligation (6). The hospital stay was 36 h. It has been observed one case of post-operative moderate vaginal hydrocele and 11 cases testicular hypertrophy. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic treatment of varicocele in adolescents reduces post-operative morbidity related to conventional open surgery. This technique has been available in two poor African countries through partnership north-south.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".