Preoperative Determination of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutation in Gliomas Using Spectral Editing <scp>MRS</scp>: A Prospective Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) technique has not yet been formally evaluated for the in vivo detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) in patients with gliomas of various grades. PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of edited MRS in the preoperative identification of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status in patients with gliomas. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Fifty-eight subjects (31 glioblastomas, 27 grade II and III gliomas). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Mescher-Garwood (MEGA)-PRESS and routine clinical brain tumor MR sequences were used at 3T. ASSESSMENT: Data were analyzed using an advanced method for accurate, robust, and efficient spectral fitting (AMARES) from jMRUI software. The amplitudes of the 2-HG, N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), and creatine/phosphocreatine (Cr) resonances were calculated with their associated Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB). The IDH1 R132H mutation status was assessed by immunohistochemistry for all patients. Patients with grades II and III gliomas with negative immunohistochemistry underwent DNA sequencing to further interrogate IDH mutation status. STATISTICAL TEST: The differences in 2-HG amplitudes, 2-HG/NAA, 2-HG/Cho, and 2-HG/Cr between IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype gliomas were assessed using Mann-Whitney U-tests. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of each parameter. RESULTS: The 2-HG amplitudes, 2-HG/NAA, and 2-HG/Cho were higher for IDH-mutant gliomas than IDH-wildtype gliomas (P < 0.007). Using a CRLB threshold <30%, a 2-HG cutoff greater than 0 had a sensitivity of 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52-96%) and a specificity of 81% (95% CI: 54-96%) in identifying IDH-mutant gliomas. In the subset of patients with grades II and III gliomas, the sensitivity was 80% (95% CI: 52-96%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI: 40-100%). Among 2-HG ratios, the highest AUC for the identification of IDH mutant status was achieved using the 2-HG/NAA (AUC = 0.8, 95% CI 0.67-.89). DATA CONCLUSION: Preoperative edited MRS appears to be able to help identify IDH-mutant gliomas with high specificity. Level of Evidence 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2021;53:416-426.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".