MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087422334 · doi:10.20517/2347-9264.2020.28

Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage regeneration

2020· article· en· W3087422334 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu‐Chun Chen, Chih-Hung Chang

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic and Aesthetic Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHsinchu Science Park Bureau, Ministry of Science and Technology, TaiwanFar Eastern Memorial Hospital
KeywordsMedicineMesenchymal stem cellCartilageOsteoarthritisTransplantationStem cellRegeneration (biology)Platelet-rich plasmaAutologous chondrocyte implantationCell therapySurgeryPathologyInternal medicineAnatomyArticular cartilage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cartilage has the ability to transmit and distribute loads, providing lubrication in the diarthrodial joints.Risk factors including age, gender, genetics, nutrition and bone density may predispose to osteoarthritis (OA) and cartilage defect formation.Appropriate treatment include sufficient rest and medical therapy.Intra-articular injections such as steroids, platelet-rich plasma, visco-supplementation and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) injections present as alternative options for non-operative treatments.For cartilage defects, microfracture (MF), osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) are the most common treatment procedures.MSCs have been identified as an ideal cell source for OA therapy because they are easily expanded in culture, generally non-tumorigenic, and can be readily obtained from patients.It may be harvested from bone marrow (BMSCs), adipose tissue (ADSCs), synovium (SDSCs) or peripheral blood.BMSCs features the most common source of stem cells, and infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) is another popular stem cell source.A phase 1 clinical study entitled "Treatment of Knee OA with Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Product (RegStem®)" was conducted in Taiwan and utilized 5 × 107 IPFP-MSCs in the study for OA therapy.Most of the existing clinical studies have shown that patients receiving MSCs treatment have improved clinical outcome, such as Visual Analogue Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score.Some studies have also found an improvement in cartilage volume by Magnetic Resonance Imaging evaluation.Furthermore, MSCs can also be used for cartilage defect treatment.Clinical outcomes such as IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores showed significant improvement when the cartilage defects were repaired and regenerated by several millions of stem cells.A 10-year follow-up clinical research indicated that there was no apparent increased tumor formation risk when BMSCs were used for cartilage defect treatment.In addition, a BMSCs/collagen gel composite for cartilage repair clinical trial in Taiwan was conducted in 2008, and results suggested that there was an improvement in IKDC and MRI score at 9-years of follow-up.It appears that the use of MSCs for OA and cartilage defect treatment may be a promising method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic and Aesthetic ResearchSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207