Genetic impact of ZNF804A on cognitive function in patients with bipolar I disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our previous genetic study identified a variant rs1344706 in the zinc finger protein 804A (ZNF804A) gene conferring susceptibility to bipolar disorder subtype I (BD-I) in Han Chinese. Literature documented that this variant may affect brain structure and function. As such, we attempted to identify whether the rs1344706 polymorphism influences cognitive function in patients with bipolar disorder I. We recruited 177 patients with bipolar disorder in remission period. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) rs1344706 was genotyped using TaqMan assays. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analysis showed a significant genotypic effect on RBANS immediate memory (P = 0.002) and total score (P = 0.001). Post hoc analysis showed that the patients with T/T genotype have lower RBANS immediate memory and total scores than those with T/G or G/G genotypes. When the patients were stratified by sex, such significances are only seen in male patients, but not female patients. Our findings suggested a sex-specific effect of ZNF804A rs1344706 polymorphism on cognitive function in patients with bipolar disorder-I.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".