MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087484826 · doi:10.3354/meps13493

Sulfur isotopes (δ34S) in Arctic marine mammals: indicators of benthic vs. pelagic foraging

2020· article· en· W3087484826 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Szpak, Michael Buckley

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenthic zonePelagic zoneForagingδ15NTrophic levelEcologyArcticOceanographyIsotope analysisMarine ecosystemBiologyEnvironmental scienceFisheryEcosystemStable isotope ratioδ13CGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consumer tissue stable carbon isotope compositions (δ 13 C) are well established indicators of benthic and pelagic foraging in marine ecosystems. Stable sulfur isotope compositions (δ 34 S) are also potentially useful in this regard but have not been widely utilized outside of estuaries and salt marsh ecosystems. To test the ability of δ 13 C and δ 34 S to reflect benthic and pelagic foraging, we analyzed the stable carbon, nitrogen (δ 15 N), and sulfur isotope compositions of bone collagen from walrus (an obligate benthic feeder) and ringed seal (a mixed benthic/pelagic feeder) sampled from across the North American Arctic. Both had relatively low δ 34 S values compared to those typically observed in marine consumers. These data suggest an important role for benthic microalgae in coastal marine food webs in the Arctic. At all of the 10 locations where both taxa could be sampled, walrus had lower δ 34 S values than ringed seal, suggesting that this measurement is a useful indicator of benthic and pelagic foraging in nearshore Arctic environments. Contrary to expectations, there were no consistent differences in δ 13 C between walrus and ringed seal at any of these sites, suggesting that this measurement may not always be best interpreted in light of benthic vs. pelagic foraging, particularly when comparisons are made across trophic levels. When the foraging ecology of a consumer is unknown, our data suggest that δ 34 S may be a more sensitive indicator of the relative importance of benthic and pelagic prey in the diet than δ 13 C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207