MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3087618334 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2020.204

Generalized Dystonia as a Prominent Feature in a Case of NUS1 Gene Mutation

2020· letter· en· W3087618334 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Steven A. Gunzler, Suzanne D. DeBrosse

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystoniaFeature (linguistics)Content (measure theory)MutationGeneAction (physics)GeneticsComputer sciencePsychologyNeuroscienceBiologyMathematicsPhysicsLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An autosomal dominant mutation of the nuclear undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase 1 (NUS1) gene, located on chromosome 6q22.1,causes a syndrome of medication-responsive absence and/or generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) epilepsy, tremors and myoclonus, intellectual disability, and cerebellar ataxia.1,2 Parkinson's disease has also been reported in NUS1 mutation.2 Aside from one prior adult patient with NUS1 mutation who was noted to have nonprogressive childhood onset arm dystonia in the setting of tremor, myoclonus, and intellectual disability, there has been no other report to our knowledge of dystonia in NUS1 mutation.3 Here, we present a case of NUS1 mutation with a prominent and progressive generalized dystonia.This 34-year-old female of mixed European ancestry developed a slight head tremor at 18 months of age.Intellectual disability was diagnosed by second grade.She developed a mild but progressive gait ataxia, dysarthria, and dyscoordination of the hands.By age 10, she had a GTC seizure followed by absence type seizures which resolved on lamotrigine and clonazepam.She experienced progressive clonazepam-responsive myoclonus beginning at the age of 13, action tremors, irritability, and mild dysphagia.Aside from an uncle with tremor, she has no other family history.Prominent and disabling slowly progressive cervical and limb dystonia responded partially to trihexyphenidyl, clonazepam, and onabotulinumtoxinA.On examination, there was intention tremor and diffuse moderate amplitude action myoclonus.There were mildly elevated knee-jerk reflexes but no frank spasticity.Prominent cervical and limb dystonia was present, with a Fahn-Marsden score of 46 out of 120, 7 months after her last onabotulinum-toxinA injections.Cervical dystonia was characterized by a 30-degree right tilt, minimal left turn, anterior shift, right shoulder elevation, and a coarse head tremor.There was dystonic posturing of the limbs with wrist and finger hyperextension, knee hyperextension, and asymmetric equinovarus posturing of the feet, with a mildly wide-based ataxic gait.She had oromandibular dystonia and a strained dystonic as well as dysarthric speech pattern.With written informed consent, pertinent examination findings including components of the Dystonia Study Group videotape examination protocol are presented 4 (see Video).Brain MRI was normal except for mild atrophy, and EEG showed generalized spike and wave complexes with bursts of generalized discharges up to 10 s in duration.Laboratory testing was normal including metabolic testing in blood and urine (plasma amino acids, plasma acylcarnitine profile, ammonia, lactate, pyruvate, copper, ceruloplasmin, urine orotic acid, CoQ10 in blood and leukocytes, transferrin, biotinidase level, lysosomal studies in leukocytes, activity of palmitoyl-protein

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms→French-language works237,207→