MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087808912 · doi:10.1002/pmrj.12497

Knee Flexion Contractures Are Associated with Worse Pain, Stiffness, and Function in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

2020· article· en· W3087808912 on OpenAlexaffabout
T. Mark Campbell, Tim Ramsay, Guy Trudel

Bibliographic record

VenuePM&R · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalÉlisabeth Bruyère Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisMedicineWOMACPhysical therapyKnee painKnee JointRange of motionCohortPhysical medicine and rehabilitationKnee replacementOrthopedic surgerySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patients with or at risk of developing knee osteoarthritis (OA) can acquire a knee flexion contracture (FC). The prevalence, severity, and association of knee FC on OA outcomes such as pain, stiffness, and function are not well described and clinical scales may omit measuring joint range of motion. OBJECTIVE: (1) To determine if the presence and severity of a knee FC was associated with worse joint pain, stiffness and/or function and (2) to determine if this association was present in participants with or at risk of knee OA. METHODS: Following a detailed standardized protocol, maximum knee extension was obtained from the baseline physical examination data using a goniometer with the fulcrum over the knee joint line, the upper arm directed towards the greater trochanter and the lower arm directed towards the lateral malleolus. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, using the Osteoarthritis Initiative database. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Baseline cross-sectional data collected from a prospective outpatient cohort study, recruiting from four academic health care centers in the United States. Three subcohorts were included: those at-risk of OA (n = 5995 knees), those with radiographic OA (n = 2610 knees), and controls (n = 62 knees). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We categorized knee FCs as none, mild, moderate, or severe. Pain scales included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale and numeric pain rating scale; stiffness, the WOMAC stiffness subscale; and function, the WOMAC function subscale and 400-m walk time. RESULTS: Participants with FC reported overall worse pain, stiffness, and function compared to those without FC in a severity-dependent manner. OA participants' scores showed between 1.8- and 11.0-fold mean relative worsening versus at-risk participants (P < .05 for all). Knee FC was independently associated in a severity-dependent manner with all outcomes (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Knee FCs were associated with worse pain, stiffness, and function in a severity-dependent manner in a population with or at risk of knee OA. There was an interaction between OA subcohort and FC severity (P-for-interaction <.01 for all WOMAC outcomes). Evaluation of the longitudinal effects of contracture on OA and at-risk patient outcomes is necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePM&RSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207