Il libro Lambda della <i>Metafisica</i> di Aristotele and Commento al libro Lambda della <i>Metafisica</i> di Aristotele
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Undoubtedly, Metaphysics Λ is among the most fascinating and influential treatises of Aristotelian writings.Because it contains Aristotle's theory of the prime mover, described as an intelligible substance and a divine intellect, it has been examined thoroughly and continually since antiquity in order to determine the very nature of Aristotle's theology and its relation to metaphysical science.With these two books, grown from a doctoral thesis (Trento and Lille, 2009), Silvia Fazzo provides a new, innovative, and wide-ranging study of book Λ.The first volume, published in 2012, contains a new edition of the Greek text with an Italian translation.The second volume, which appeared in 2014, presents a detailed commentary.Both constitute a very rich, learned work that is based on a precise knowledge of the text and an extensive bibliography.Both volumes also form a strong unity which perfectly exemplifies Fazzo's aim to link the task of establishing what Aristotle really says with the understanding of why he says it [1.12].In this regard, many of the most significant interpretations that she develops in the second volume stem directly from either the text or the translation that she adopts in the first; conversely, some aspects of her edition constitute in themselves a doctrinal interpretation.The major characteristic of these two works is their deep originality.Fazzo often states that she wishes to dispose of the previous editorial and exegetical tradition [e.g., 1.14, 28; 2.11, 25, 40-42] in order to study Metaphysics Λ in itself and not as it has been subsequently perceived, interpreted, or even reconstructed.This basic methodological principle, which runs across both volumes, leads Fazzo to elaborate some radical views, often in contradiction with the standard interpretation of the text. 1 Even if Harlfinger [1979] showed that the MS A b changes its affiliation in Λ 7.1073a1 and belongs from this point to the α-family (being a copy of a lost MS δ, which derives from the same source as J, namely, γ), A b still remains in principle, together with M and C, a major witness to one of the two branches of the textual tradition of Λ 1-7.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".