MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3087924087 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abdec0

Rotation Measure Evolution of the Repeating Fast Radio Burst Source FRB 121102

2021· article· en· W3087924087 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoMcGill University
FundersNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMax-Planck-GesellschaftDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean CommissionUniversity of Central FloridaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsFast radio burstNeutron starMagnetarSupernovaRedshiftSupernova remnantPulsarFaraday effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The repeating fast radio burst source FRB 121102 has been shown to have an exceptionally high and variable Faraday rotation measure (RM), which must be imparted within its host galaxy, likely by or within its local environment. In the redshifted ( z = 0.193) source reference frame, the RM decreased from 1.46 × 10 5 rad m −2 to 1.33 × 10 5 rad m −2 between 2017 January and August, showing day-timescale variations of ∼200 rad m −2 . Here we present 16 FRB 121102 RMs from burst detections with the Arecibo 305 m radio telescope, the Effelsberg 100 m, and the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array, providing a record of FRB 121102’s RM over a 2.5 yr time span. Our observations show a decreasing trend in RM, although the trend is not linear, dropping by an average of 15% year −1 and is ∼ 9.7 × 10 4 rad m −2 at the most recent epoch of 2019 August. Erratic, short-term RM variations of ∼10 3 rad m −2 week −1 were also observed between MJDs 58215–58247. A decades-old neutron star embedded within a still-compact supernova remnant or a neutron star near a massive black hole and its accretion torus have been proposed to explain the high RMs. We compare the observed RMs to theoretical models describing the RM evolution for FRBs originating within a supernova remnant. FRB 121102’s age is unknown, and we find that the models agree for source ages of ∼6–17 yr at the time of the first available RM measurements in 2017. We also draw comparisons to the decreasing RM of the Galactic center magnetar, PSR J1745−2900.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207