Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este ensaio apresenta uma análise da obra de Nelson Rodrigues sob o enfoque de um tema: Prazer e Religião. Nelson Rodrigues é considerado um dos ícones do teatro brasileiro e fundador do expressionismo como linguagem teatral no Brasil. Entender Nelson Rodrigues e sua obra passa pelo entendimento dos fatores constitutivos de sua vida, formação religiosa, opção pelo expressionismo, seus dramas pessoais e sua criatividade literária. O prazer em Nelson Rodrigues torna-se uma religião na medida em que celebra a vida, e a religião é a própria vida na medida de seus temas recorrentes.Palavras-chave: Prazer, Religião, Nelson Rodrigues, Expressionismo, Vida e Morte.AbstractThis essay presents an analysis of Nelson Rodrigues work under the focus of a theme: Pleasure and Religion. Nelson Rodrigues is considered one of Brazilian theater icons and the founder of expressionism as a theatrical language in Brazil. Understanding Nelson Rodrigues and his work involves the understanding of the constitutive factors of his life, religious formation, expressionism choice, his personal dramas and literary creativity. Nelson Rodrigues's pleasure becomes a religion insofar as it celebrates life, and religion is life itself to the extent of its recurring themes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".