PENGARUH PENGANGGURAN DAN INFLASI TERHADAP PRODUK DOMESTIK BRUTO INDONESIA TAHUN 2009-2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sesuai dengan pasal 33 UUD 1945, tujuan utama pemerintah Indonesia adalah kemakmuran rakyat Indonesia. Negara dikatakan makmur jika sebagian besar kebutuhan rakyatnya terpenuhi. Alat pemuas kebutuhan berupa barang dan jasa yang dihasilkan di wilayah Indonesi yaitu Pendapatan Domestik Bruto. Terdapat banyak faktor agregatif ayang berpengaruh terhadap Produk domestik Bruto, diantaranya Pengangguran dan Inflasi. Penelitian ini meneliti pengaruh pengangguran dan inflasi terhadap Produk Domestik Bruto. Penelitian pada pebngaruh variabel bebas Pengangguran (X1) terhadap Produk Domestik Bruto (Y) menghasilkan nilai t hitung sebesar -4.974 > 2.300 (t tabel). Penelitian pada pengaruh variabel bebas Inflasi (X2) terhadap variabel terikat Produk Domestik Bruto menghasilkan nilai t hitung sebesar 1.511 < 2.300 (t tabel). Uji linier berganda pada penelitian ini menghasilkan nilai F hitung sebesar 14.834 > 4.35 (F tabel). Persamaan regresi pada penelitian ini adalah Y = 21036872.292 – 1.526 X1 – 127482.199X2 + e. Nilai R koefisien korelasi sebesar 0,900 dan nilai R square 0,809.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".