Numerical Investigation of the Capture Efficiency of a Domestic Range Hood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Comfort criteria in building are increasing continuously. Multiple studies tend to use CFD approaches in order to predict and optimize the flow conditions accurately. One of the most relevant problematic is the extraction of the CO2 by kitchen hoods. In the present work, a new solver, based on a buoyancy Boussinesq solver and a turbulent passive scalar transport equation, is developed in OpenFoam to model the heated CO2 extraction by a rotating fan using the Multiple reference frame (MRF) approach. The new solver is first validated successfully against experimental results of a heated cavity and CO2 diffusion. An improvement of 30% in the capture efficiency is reached by increasing the extraction flow rate of the fan from 100 to 300 cfm. An extraction efficiency of 100% is observed for flow rates above 330 cfm. The novelty of this study is to present a new open-source solver able to model the rotation of the whole fan, CO2 transport and heat exchange simultaneously in steady state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".