Practical implementation of high-resolution electron ptychography and comparison with off-axis electron holography
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ptychography is a coherent diffractive imaging technique that can determine how an electron wave is transmitted through an object by probing it in many small overlapping regions and processing the diffraction data obtained at each point. The resulting electron transmission model describes both phase and amplitude changes to the electron wave. Ptychography has been adopted in transmission electron microscopy in recent years following advances in high-speed direct electron detectors and computer algorithms which now make the technique suitable for practical applications. Its ability to retrieve quantitative phase information at high spatial resolution makes it a plausible alternative or complement to electron holography. Furthermore, unlike off-axis electron holography, it can provide phase information without an electron bi-prism assembly or the requirement of a minimally structured region adjacent to the region of interest in the object. However, it does require a well-calibrated scanning transmission electron microscope and a well-managed workflow to manage the calibration, data acquisition and reconstruction process to yield a practical technique. Here we detail this workflow and highlight how this is greatly assisted by acquisition management software. Through experimental data and modelling we also explore the similarities and differences between high-resolution ptychography and electron holography. Both techniques show a dependence of the recovered phase on the crystalline orientation of the material which is attributable to dynamical scattering. However, the exact nature of the variation differs reflecting fundamental expectations, but nonetheless equally useful information is obtained from electron holography and the ptychographically determined object transmission function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it