Upregulation of bromodomain PHD finger transcription factor in ovarian cancer and its critical role for cancer cell proliferation and survival
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bromodomain PHD finger transcription factor (BPTF) is a core subunit of the nucleosome-remodeling factor (NURF) complex, which plays an important role in the development of several cancers. However, it is unknown whether BPTF regulates the progression of ovarian cancer (OC). To investigate this, we measured the relative expression levels of BPTF in OC cell lines and tissues using Western blot and immunohistochemistry, respectively, and the results were analyzed using the χ 2 test. We also examined the effects from BPTF knockdown on the proliferation, migration, invasiveness, and apoptosis of OC cell lines. Mechanistic studies revealed that these effects were achieved through simultaneous modulation of multiple signaling pathways. We found that BPTF was highly expressed in OC cell lines and tissues compared with a normal human ovarian epithelial cell line and non-cancerous tissues (P < 0.05). These results are also supported by the public RNA-seq data. BPTF overexpression was correlated with a poor prognosis for OC patient survival (P < 0.05). In vitro experiments revealed that the downregulation of BPTF inhibited OC cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, and invasiveness, and induced apoptosis. BPTF knockdown also affected the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) signaling pathways and induced the cleavage of apoptosis-related proteins. Consequently, BPTF plays a critical role in OC cell survival, and functions as a potential therapeutic target for OC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".