Single-cell transcriptomics, scRNA-Seq and C1 CAGE discovered distinct phases of pluripotency during naïve-to-primed conversion in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Two types of mammalian pluripotent stem cells (PSC), i.e. naïve and primed possess distinct cellular characteristics. It is largely unknown how these differences are generated during naïve-to-primed transition process. We have established a robust in vitro transition system using a Wnt inhibitor for the first time and analyzed dynamic changes in cellular status via single-cell RNA-sequencing and C1 CAGE analyses. Results Analysis of known marker genes suggested that the cell transition process progresses as expected. However, cluster analyses revealed a sudden increase in expression profile diversities three and four days after induction of the transition. These expression diversities can be reconciled by the presence of two subpopulations with distinct transcription profiles emerging at these time points. One of the subpopulations appears transiently, and surprisingly these cells showed a global downregulation of gene expression. Moreover, initiation of random X chromosome inactivation (XCI) coincides with the appearance of these transient cells. The other subpopulation can be maintained as a stem cell line and possesses expression profiles more similar to those of primed epiblast stem cells (EpiSC) than embryonic stem cells (ESC). However, there are important differences in gene expression related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), suggesting that this subpopulation may represent a novel pluripotent state that has an intermediate cellular phenotype between ESC and EpiSC. Conclusions These findings should contribute to our understanding of the establishment and maintenance of distinct differentiation statuses of mammalian PSCs and provide new insights into the pluripotency spectrum in general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".