MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3088292278

공학에 기반한 블록 쌓기 문제해결과정에서의 유아들의 경험 탐색

2018· article· ko· W3088292278 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
김현수, 안효진

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly childhood education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

본 연구는 유아들이 공학에 기반한 블록 쌓기 문제를 해결하는 과정을 탐구하였다. 연구 참여자는 I 시에 위치한 Y 유치원의 만 4세 유아 13명이며 관찰, 인터뷰, 비디오 촬영을 통해 자료를 수집하였다. 자료 분석 결과, 첫째, 유아들은 반복적인 문제해결, 브레인스토밍과 의사결정, 설계 테스트 및 평가, 수학적, 과학적 개념의 적용과 같은 공학적 설계 과정을 경험하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 유아들은 공학에 기반한 블록 쌓기 문제를 해결하는 과정에서 끈기, 협력, 의사소통과 같은 공학적 사고를 경험하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 유아공학교육에 대한 방향을 제시하고, 이와 관련한 교육과정 개발에 기초적인 자료로 활용될 것으로 기대한다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.016
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly childhood education→Same topicMilitary Technology and Strategies→French-language works237,207→