MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088306168 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108169

Limiting RyR2 Open Time Prevents Alzheimer’s Disease-Related Neuronal Hyperactivity and Memory Loss but Not β-Amyloid Accumulation

2020· article· en· W3088306168 on OpenAlexafffund
Jinjing Yao, Bo Sun, Ádám Institóris, Xiaoqin Zhan, Wenting Guo, Zhenpeng Song, Yajing Liu, Florian Hiess, Andrew K. J. Boyce, Mingke Ni, Ruiwu Wang, Henk ter Keurs, Thomas G. Back, Michael Fill, Roger Thompson, Ray W. Turner, Grant R. Gordon, S.R. Wayne Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthArmy Medical University
KeywordsNeuroscienceRyanodine receptor 2Hippocampal formationAlzheimer's diseaseMemory impairmentAmyloid (mycology)MedicineBiologyRyanodine receptorInternal medicineDiseaseReceptorPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

current, a well-known neuronal excitability control that is downregulated in AD. Pharmacologically limiting RyR2 open time with the R-carvedilol enantiomer (but not racemic carvedilol) prevents and rescues neuronal hyperactivity, memory impairment, and neuron loss even in late stages of AD. These AD-related deficits are prevented even with continued β-amyloid accumulation. Thus, limiting RyR2 open time may be a hyperactivity-directed, non-β-amyloid-targeted anti-AD strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207