Socio-Pedagogical Support of Child’s Personality Socialization at the Stage of Preschool Childhood Social Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This paper is directed at development and experimentally test the effectiveness of the system of socio-pedagogical support of socialization of the individual; determining the pedagogical conditions for ensuring the harmonious socialization of children in preschool education. The basis of the analysis of the project of social and pedagogical support of the child’s socialization is its humanitarian direction. Background: The relevance of the study is the creation and development of a system of socio-pedagogical support of personality socialization in preschool childhood was confirmed. Method: The implementation of certain tasks was carried out using a set of research methods: the theoretical method, which allows a systematic analysis of philosophical, psychological, sociological, cultural, and pedagogical scientific and methodological literature on socialization, education, and personal development; the empirical methods (observation, interviews, surveys, questionnaires, testing, the study of documentation), which allow to comprehensively consider the specifics of pedagogical activities of teachers to implement the socialization process and levels of socialization of children. Results: The results of the experimental test of the system of social and pedagogical support of personality socialization in preschool childhood developed by us proved its effectiveness, which confirms the quantitative and qualitative changes in the levels of socialization of preschool children. Conclusion: The paper established the state of awareness of preschool teachers with the processes of socialization of the child in preschool childhood; criteria, indicators, and levels of personality socialization in preschool childhood; the pedagogical conditions for the effective course of the process of socialization of children in preschool educational institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".