MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088333959 · doi:10.1097/dss.0000000000002790

Intralesional Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Chondrodermatitis Nodularis Helicis: A Novel Treatment for Rapid Relief of Pain and Healing of Ulcerations

2020· article· en· W3088333959 on OpenAlexaff
Wayne Carey

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatologic Surgery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDermatological and Skeletal Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyaluronic acidSurgeryAdverse effectNodule (geology)DermatologyInternal medicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis (CNH) is a common chronic condition characterized by a tender nodule on the helix or antihelix of the ear which may or may not have accompanying crusting, scaling, or ulceration and that is often difficult to treat. OBJECTIVE: Develop an easy, effective, and durable treatment to reduce the pain and clinical signs including ulcerations associated with CNH using injectable hyaluronic acid (HA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients were injected and followed up in 2 to 4 weeks intervals using 0.2 to 0.3 mL of various HA with a high G-Prime. RESULTS: Injectable HA significantly improved the symptoms and also the clinical appearance of all patients treated after 1 or 2 injections except 1 patient. Extrusion of the material through a preexisting ulcer usually required a second follow-up injection 2 weeks later. No adverse events were noted with the injections other than the intentional visible bulging of the injected region with HA. CONCLUSION: Injectable HA provides almost immediate relief from the discomfort of CNH in most cases in less than 1 or 2 weeks, significantly improves the clinical appearance over time and resolves accompanying ulcerations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatologic SurgerySame topicDermatological and Skeletal DisordersFrench-language works237,207