On‐Chip Rotation of <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> Using Microfluidic Vortices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Precise and controllable rotation of small biological samples is essential to many biological and medical applications. This paper reports, an easy‐to‐use microfluidic device to rotate single nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans in a reliable and controllable fashion, which was enabled by on‐chip generation of stable microscale vortices inside a worm‐loaded microchannel by fluidic shear stress. To test the capability of the proposed device, single worms were successfully rotated in continuous and stepwise modes. Using this device, clear visualization of all dopaminergic neurons in the head of a C. elegans was demonstrated by capturing fluorescence images of the worm body at several rotational angles. Multiple perspectives of individual neurons of a multi‐color fluorescent transgenic worm were also obtained at high resolution using laser‐scanning confocal microscopy. The results show that this microfluidic rotation device provides a simple solution to overcoming limitations of confocal microscopy when imaging relatively thick tissue samples such as an adult C. elegans , and is compatible with multiple fluorescent proteins with different spectral properties. With its controllability, precision, and simplicity in fabrication and operation, this microfluidic device has important utility in model organism studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it