Evaluating the impact of the product element and logistics service quality on the customer experience in construction Industries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this research was to evaluate the impact of the product element and logistics service quality on the customer experience within construction industries. A questionnaire was developed for data collection based on the gap analysis identified in the literature review. The questionnaire was administered face-to-face to customers associated with the construction industry. A structural model was created and the data were analysed by Structural Equation Modelling using IBM SPSS-AMOS Statistics for Windows version 21. Two aspects of product specialization and four aspects of customer experience were identified as key constructs for customer satisfaction. Product specialization was dependent on product marketing and product attributes. Customer experience was dependent on reputation, confidence, information and expertise. The analysis showed that product specialization and customer experience were major contributors to customer satisfaction. Recommendations using these findings were made for participating construction companies to restructure their business strategies to offer better services vital to customer satisfaction and better business.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it