Penerapan Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor terhadap Kendaraan Bernomor Polisi Luar Wilayah Bali
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seeing the number of vehicles with police numbers outside the area operating in Bali, in the Bali Provincial Regulation No. 4 of 2016 concerning the Implementation of Traffic and Public Transportation it is explained that vehicles from outside the Bali area can only be in Bali for 3 consecutive months if they exceed that time. then must do Transfer of Name Duty. This research is formulated to determine the imposition of motor vehicle tax in Bali Province, and to determine the intensification of motor vehicle tax imposition on police numbered vehicles from outside Bali. This research uses empirical law research type. The results of this study indicate that the collection of Motor Vehicle Tax in Bali Province can be carried out by taxpayers by following the procedures for implementing Motor Vehicle Tax collection as contained in the Regional Regulation of the Province of Bali Number 1 of 2011 concerning Regional Taxes. Regarding vehicles with police numbers outside the Bali Region, they cannot be taxed because there are no regulations governing these vehicles. This has also led the Bali Provincial Government to plan several efforts for vehicles outside the Bali region that have passed the time to reverse name.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".