MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improving the iron status of school children through a school noon meal programme with meals prepared using a multiple micronutrient-fortified salt in Tamil Nadu, India.

2020· article· en· W3088803816 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsNutrition International
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTamilMicronutrientMealSchool mealNoonEnvironmental healthFood scienceMedicineBiologyArtPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To improve the iron status of school children through noon meals prepared using a multiple micronutrient-fortified salt. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Children from a randomly selected school who consumed (intervention) and did not consume (reference) a noon meal prepared using a multiple micronutrient- fortified salt were studied over 1 year. A pre-post-test design for children aged 5-17years in reference (n=100) and intervention (n=128) groups was used. Levels of serum ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), alpha glycoprotein (AGP), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed at baseline and at 1 year. In a subsample, urinary iodine was assessed. RESULTS: sTfR decreased in the intervention group (-0.80 mg/L) but increased in the reference group (0.47 mg/L) at 1 year (p=0.0001).Body iron stores (BIS) increased in the intervention group (0.09 mg/kg body weight) and decreased (-0.58 mg/kg body weight) in the reference group at 1 year (p=0.028).These findings indicate an increase in iron deficiency in the reference group and a decrease in the intervention group. However, no changes in serum ferritin and urinary iodine were observed in either group or between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Iron status can be improved in schoolchildren in Tamil Nadu by increasing the amount of micronutrients in the fortified salt used for preparing noon-time school meals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicIron Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207