MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088868667 · doi:10.1021/acsaem.0c01641

Stabilizing Tin Anodes in Sodium-Ion Batteries by Alloying with Silicon

2020· article· en· W3088868667 on OpenAlex
Sayed Youssef Sayed, W. Peter Kalisvaart, Erik J. Luber, Brian C. Olsen, Jillian M. Buriak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Energy Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsTinSiliconMaterials scienceAnodeFaraday efficiencyChemical engineeringSodiumElectrodeMetallurgyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Group IV of the periodic table is a promising column with respect to high capacity anode materials for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). Unlike carbon which relies on interlayer defects, pores, and intercalation to store sodium, its heavier cousins—silicon, germanium, and tin—form binary alloys with sodium. Alloying does lead to the formation of high-capacity compounds, but they are, however, susceptible to large volumetric changes upon expansion that results in pulverization of the electrodes and poor cycling stability. Silicon and tin are particularly intriguing due to their high theoretical reversible capacities of 954 mAh/g (NaSi) and 847 mAh/g (Na15Sn4), respectively, but suffer from poor practical capacity and very short lifetimes, respectively. To buffer the detrimental effects of volume expansion and contraction, nanoscale multilayer anodes comprising silicon and tin films were prepared and compared with uniform films composed of atomically mixed silicon and tin as well as elemental silicon and tin films. The results reveal that the high capacity fade for elemental Sn is associated with detrimental anodic (desodiation) reactions at a high cutoff voltage with a threshold defined as ∼0.8 VNa. Binary mixtures of Si and Sn were tested in a number of different architectures, including multilayer films and cosputtered films with varying volume ratios of both elements. All mixed films showed improved capacity retention compared to the performance of anodes comprising only elemental Sn. A multilayer structure composed of 3 nm thick silicon and tin layers showed the highest Coulombic efficiency and retained 97% of its initial capacity after 100 cycles, which is vastly improved compared to 7% retention observed for the elemental Sn film. The alloying element, Si, plays two roles: it stabilizes grain growth/pulverization and also alters the surface chemistry of the anodes, thus affecting the formation of solid electrolyte interphase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it