MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Penegakan Hukum terhadap Guest House dan Villa tanpa Izin di Kabupaten Badung

2020· article· en· W3088889739 on OpenAlexaff
Cinta Saraswati, I Made Arjaya, Diah Gayatri Sudibya

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Interpretasi Hukum · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSanctionsTourismDemolitionRevenueBusinessLawService (business)EngineeringPolitical scienceFinanceCivil engineeringMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tourism is a source of local revenue and its investment is a potentially vital production factor in the service production business in this field. To support tourism accommodation in the tourist area of ​​Badung Regency, guest houses (boarding houses/rented houses) and villas are needed as support. Especially in Badung Regency, in the Canggu area, many houses are used as guest houses for guests who want to stay in Bali. This study aims to determine the supervision of Guest Houses and Villas in Badung Regency, and to determine the application of sanctions against guest houses and villas that violate permits in Badung Regency. The method in this research is a type of normative legal research which is carried out with the method of recording and reviewing based on legal materials. In this study, studying and gathering information through legal science books without deviating from positive law in order to form a conclusion. The research results show that the supervision of Guest Houses and Villas in Badung Regency is given the authority by the Regional Regulation through the Civil Service Police Unit which is assigned to monitor every building that does not have a permit in the Badung Regency area, especially in the Canggu area. Then, sanctions against violators are in the form of warnings 3 times, if they do not disobey the villa owner, they will be subject to forced demolition by officers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Interpretasi HukumSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207