Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Scleral Lens with Varying Limbal Clearance in Keratoconus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE: This study evaluates how limbal clearance (LC) may impact the clinical performance of scleral lenses based on subjective response on comfort and ocular responses. Limbal zone designs in scleral lenses might affect the integrity of the limbal epithelial tissue as a result of a combined hypoxic and compression-related etiology. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the clinical performance and ocular and subjective responses to the wear of scleral lenses having varying LC. METHODS: Lenses with varying LC with a difference of 50 μm were fitted on and compared among keratoconic participants. The lenses were worn during a 2-week period. Visual analog scales concerning subjective comfort were completed. Ocular surface findings including hyperemia, limbal staining, and corneal swelling were compared. RESULTS: Participants reported greater comfort achieved with high LC. No difference in limbal and bulbar hyperemia was found (P > .05). Corneal response to scleral lens wear with both low and high LCs seems to result in similar perilimbal staining and negative corneal staining. An increase in corneal pachymetric values was noted at the central and peripheral cornea, with no difference between low- and high-LC lenses (all, P < .05). Quadrant-specific analysis indicated that all meridians at both 6 and 8 mm were increased for the low-LC lenses (all, P < .05) and only the temporal region for the high-LC lenses (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Limbal clearance may play an important role in subjective performance in scleral lenses but does not impact the degree of hyperemia in either the limbal or bulbar region. Although low LC might result in more compression-related changes to ocular surface, high LC is associated with greater comfort and greater edematous changes. Limbal zone designs in scleral lenses might affect the integrity of the limbal epithelial tissue as a result of a combined hypoxic and compression-related etiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".