MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3088987101 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2020-0105

Prediction of oil film thickness in trochoidal pump

2020· article· en· W3088987101 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Tomović, Lozica Ivanović, Tihomir Mačkić, Blaža Stojаnović, Jasna Glišović

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
KeywordsLubricationReynolds equationOil pumpMaterials scienceMechanicsCoupling (piping)Reliability (semiconductor)Process (computing)Control theory (sociology)Mechanical engineeringEngineeringComposite materialComputer scienceThermodynamicsPhysicsReynolds numberControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A model for predicting the oil film thickness between the contact surfaces of the gerotor pump teeth is given in this paper. Gerotor pumps are rotary pumps with inner trochoidal gearing. The working process of the pump is followed by mechanical losses due to friction that occurs between the coupled surfaces. To reduce these losses and avoid wearing of the teeth’s active surfaces, it is necessary to provide a minimum thickness of the oil film between the contact surfaces. The minimum thickness of the oil film depends on many different factors, but in this paper for its determination, the Hamrock and Dowson empirical equation is used. Previously, the mathematical model that follows the change of relative velocities in contact, sliding velocity, rolling velocity, and contact force at the contact points of the coupled teeth profiles is developed. The influence of different parameters on the lubrication regime has been analyzed, and it has been shown that the trochoidal pump operates most with the limit EHD lubrication regime. The most unfavorable period occurs when the resulting rolling velocity decreases significantly, and this period dominates during coupling. The results of this research provide guidelines for the design of the tooth profile’s shape and the choice of operating parameters of the pump with high reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207